1 comment on “Another Nanoloop 1.2 on eBay”

Another Nanoloop 1.2 on eBay


Here’s another Nanoloop cart turned up on eBay. At the time of writing it was still available, but it does have a buy it now option on it.

Nanoloop 1.2 on eBay

Bookmark and Share var addthis_pub = ‘PalmSounds’;http://s7.addthis.com/js/widget.php?v=10

1 comment on “RecTools08 prototype”

RecTools08 prototype


Thanks to Nimlet and Robman for the link to this blog.


As you can see, YUDO are look at adding effects and instruments to RecTools08, which is great. As I can’t speak or read Japanese I can’t tell you what it says, but it does look good, and I hope we don’t have to wait too long to see it in action.


I’m hoping that they’ll at least get the effects and audio file import into the next version. I think that would be a great next step.


RecTools08 at the app store:
Rectools08pro Multi Track Recorder

Bookmark and Share var addthis_pub = ‘PalmSounds’;http://s7.addthis.com/js/widget.php?v=10

1 comment on “DGOS update”

DGOS update

Another DGOS update for those interested in the alternative dual boot OS that’s on the way.

Only a brief update this time, but at least it is still moving forward.

Bookmark and Share var addthis_pub = ‘PalmSounds’;http://s7.addthis.com/js/widget.php?v=10

1 comment on “New Yonac app: PitchBot”

New Yonac app: PitchBot

Yonac bring another new app to the store, this time a tuner called PitchBot. They’ve written all about it on their blog, so I’ll let you read it there.

PitchBot at the app store:
PitchBot - Smart Chromatic Tuner

Bookmark and Share var addthis_pub = ‘PalmSounds’;http://s7.addthis.com/js/widget.php?v=10

2 comments on “More on what ioLibrary API is and does”

More on what ioLibrary API is and does


Following the ongoing discussion about ioLibrary, Amidio have published details today at their blog. They’ve also posted this comment on the previous post at Palm Sounds on the same subject:

Okay, we released the ioLibrary API v.1.2. We will send it by email to anyone interested, however the package contents are confidential.

The API is done in a form of a compileable app. All the sources are there, it’s not a binary library. Everything is quite simple, but it works.

At this stage, API is offered at “as is” principle (ie no custom modifications), but we’re open to discussion if you find something objectionable.

All the legal issues are covered and everything’s OK to use it in your own apps (i’m short of time to cover this in detail)

The API is 100% legal with Apple (our own apps demostrate this)

Apart from basic audio exchange functionality, current version of ioLibrary API (1.2) offers:

– direct Beatmaker export (since Beatmaker has access to ioLibrary folder)

– direct SoundCloud.com export (via the SoundCloud API)

– built-in Wi-Fi server with the possibility of multi-upload (zipped files)

We’re working on implementing sync to global clock between apps.

From a users point of view it sounds very exciting indeed, but I can understand the issues that have been voiced so far, and I hope that between Amidio and the developers they are trying to work with, a real solution can be worked out.

Bookmark and Share var addthis_pub = ‘PalmSounds’;http://s7.addthis.com/js/widget.php?v=10

3 comments on “Discussion over ioLibrary”

Discussion over ioLibrary

Well my two recent posts on Amidio’s ioLibrary have raised some interesting questions about ioLibrary. I think it would be good to get this debate out in the open and get an upnderstanding on what other developers and users think about the issues. To start I’m going to use the comments left by Richard as a prompt:

I would love to see an open dialog on the subject of interoperability standards among iPhone music apps. Palm Sounds seems like a great forum to get that started.

There are a number of legal and practical concerns around any solution where competitors are working together to create a mutually beneficial solution.

– Is the solution verifiable as compliant with the terms of Apple’s SDK license agreement and the App Store approval practices?

– Is the solution legal with respect to US and other antitrust laws (a.k.a. competition law)? (Any time competitors enter into agreements for their mutual benefit this is a concern.)

– What is the form of the interface? (i.e. proprietary binary, open source code, proprietary source code, open specification, proprietary specification etc.)

– Who owns and controls the interface? Who owns the implementation of the interface? What are the terms of use?

– As with all standards there needs to be accountability for compliance. How is that going to happen? Who will validate compliance with the standard? How will an end user know that the product will work?

– Why would a developer put a competitor’s binary code in their app without source code?

– What do end users actually want and need?
(CAF files. Really?)

– Are the solutions practical? (e.g. WAV file export and import over the cell network is moving huge files (approx 10MB/min of music) and uses huge amounts of device power and network bandwidth. (An implementation might violate Apple’s rumored 4.5MB/5 minutes maximum rule for cell network bandwidth use causing the app to be rejected from the App Store.)

– Are the solutions properly licensed? For example, ZIP files and MP3 files may be covered by various patents. If some of the implementation’s functionality may use patented functionality who would be responsible for the license and royalties? The library creator or library user?
Are there any OSS licenses involved in the library that need to be disclosed?

Creating standards is not easy. For better or worse the days of the wild west on the App Store are over. Apple will force compliance with laws and proper practices if only because they are a party (as an agent) in App Store sales transactions.

These are just a few of the issues that come to mind. I’d like to see the discussion driven into the full light of day.

Thanks,

-Richard Lawler

I’d really welcome comments on this post please, and let’s make this as constructive a debate as we can, as it is in everyone’s interest to make this work and get it right.

UPDATE: I thought I’d just link in the two previous posts on this discussion: 1, and 2

Bookmark and Share var addthis_pub = ‘PalmSounds’;http://s7.addthis.com/js/widget.php?v=10

0 comments on “Zune HD to be $100 cheaper the iPod Touch”

Zune HD to be $100 cheaper the iPod Touch

AppleInsider has this story on the Zune HD being cheaper at launch than the Touch. All well and good, but as far as I know there is still very little information on what ‘applications’ or games or whatever will run on the thing.

If there’s little or nothing then I think they could sell it for $100 less or more and a lot of people still wouldn’t consider it a viable alternative.

Bookmark and Share var addthis_pub = ‘PalmSounds’;http://s7.addthis.com/js/widget.php?v=10

0 comments on “Nokia N810 Internet Tablet for £129.99”

Nokia N810 Internet Tablet for £129.99


Some may be interested in this. The N810 is available from the UK expansys store for only £129.99. I think that this is one of the tablets that supports the Garnet VM. If I’m wrong please let me know.

Bookmark and Share var addthis_pub = ‘PalmSounds’;http://s7.addthis.com/js/widget.php?v=10

%d bloggers like this: